The widely-praised German model of the Angela Merkel regime to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic is now engulfed in a series of potentially devastating scandals going to the very heart of the testing and medical advice being used to declare draconian economic shutdowns and next, de facto mandatory vaccinations. The scandals involve a professor at the heart of Merkel’s corona advisory group. The implications go far beyond German borders to the very WHO itself and their global recommendations.
OVERVIEW
-SARS-CoV-2 is a name given to a computer generated virus model. Even if the computer constructed virus sequence of some 30,000 nucleotides had been imperically determined (which it hasn't by any means since the alleged "virus" has never been purified, i.e. isolated completely from other materials), commonly used PCR tests would only be looking for two very short segments amounting to less than 1% of the entire sequence. PCR itself amplifies very short DNA sequences that have not been proven to belong to viral strands, and could very possibly belong to natural cell or microbial DNA within the human body.
-The German (Corman, et. al.) paper upon which the great majority of rt-PCR tests for Sars-CoV-2 have been based was published online by Ecosurveillance on January 23, 2020, only 48 hours after submission and prior to any Chinese studies being released. No public peer review was ever performed before its publication.
-The assumptions put forth in the paper were accepted without question by the WHO and promulgated worldwide by the WHO and by Christian Drosten (one of the paper's authors and the most influential authority to the Merkel government on Covid-19, to the exclusion of any dissenting voices).
-In July of 2020, biologist Stefan Lanka pressed charges against Christian Drosten for intentionally deceiving the public and for crimes against humanity.
-On Nov. 27, 2020, an independent peer review by 22 members of the International Consortium of Scientists in Life Sciences (ICSLS) found 10 major flaws in the "Corman-Drosten" paper, revealing that all assumptions about SARS-CoV-2 and about PCR results worldwide need to be seriously reassessed.
-On December 14th, 2020, the WHO released a guidance memo warning that high cycle thresholds on PCR tests (an ubiquitous and unjustified lab practice for SARS-CoV-2 PCR tests throughout most of the world) result in "false positives". Why did this warning come so late after widespread panic and extreme measures based on PCR "case counts"?
-Courts in Portugal, Germany, Netherlands and Austria rule that PCR is not a trustworthy diagnostic for Covid-19 and that quaranteening and other social distancing measures based solely on these test results are unwarranted and unconstitutional.
-In Dec. 2020, German-American lawyer Reiner Fuellmich issued Christian Drosten a cease and desist order, levying hefty charges. Fuellmich is an anti-fraud lawyer who has won monumental cases against the world’s largest corporations.
-On July 10, 2020, four lawyers, including Fuellmich, formed the "Corona Extra-parlamentary Inquiry Committee" to attempt to discover the real facts about the pandemic. After months of investigation, they and many others who have joined them are co-ordinating numerous well-fundamented lawsuits around the world to bring to account scientists, politicians, the media, and tech companies who have decieved the entire world. Many of these lawsuits center around how PCR has been used to give the false impression of a pandemic out of control.
What is PCR and what does it look for?
Since January of 2020, PCR test results presumably able to detect a novel coronavirus, later named SARS-CoV-2, have been reported daily by the media as evidence of the exponential rise in "new cases", "new infections", and the "spread of the pandemic". Remarkably, few have bothered to ask just exactly what PCR does and what it detects.
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) is a DNA amplification process. It does not ever in any case detect "viruses". Rather, PCR amplifies very short DNA sequences that could belong to native cell material (including what have been called endosomes, exosomes, or micro-vesicles), or ubiquitous undefined microbial DNA/RNA found throughout the human body. Ascribing certain short DNA or RNA molecules to viruses is common in virology, but it assumes that said viruses have actually been properly and correctly identified, characterized, and sequenced. An article by Jorg Berg (translated by Corona Investigative) takes a close look at one of the earliest papers (Feb. 3, 2020) proposing a sequence for the assumed, but never purified (i.e. truly isolated) SARS-CoV-2 virus...
"The publication by Fan Wu et al, in Nature, Vol 579 of 3.2.2020 (7), in which the genome (complete genome strand) of SARS-CoV-2 was presented for the first time and advanced to the template of all further alignments, showed that the entire RNA obtained from a bronchial lavage (BALF) of a patient had clearly been used without prior isolation or enrichment of viral structures or nucleic acids. In this publication Prof. Zhang describes how he calculates a genome of 29,803 nucleotides from short gene segments with a length of only 21 and 25 nucleotides (these are the default parameters in the alignment programs used, Megahit and Trinity) using a given sequence of a genome (harmless bat corona virus) in seven different, very complex methods, including statistical methods. This RNA was then converted into cDNA and molecules with a length of just 150 nucleotides were sequenced to construct the complete genome of approx. 30,000 nucleotides."
It is only such very short DNA molecules that PCR is able to amplify by repeatedly doubling the amount of specific DNA molecules, through the use of primers and probes, until a very minute amount of DNA material becomes visible (by attaching a phosphoresent molecule). "For example, the well-known test by Christian Drosten, searches for a sequence of 213 nucleotides in an alleged viral genome of 30,000 nucleotides in total. In other words, less than one percent," notes Raphael Haumann in PCR-A critical examination.
Since SARS-Cov-2 is assumed to be an RNA virus, first RNA must be converted into cDNA using an enzyme called reverse transcriptase (a process in itself contributing to innacuracy) before certain short DNA sequences can be looked for using PCR.
Continuing with Berg:
"Prof. Zhang and all the others have overlooked the fact that in the bronchial lavage obtained, known and unknown microbes of all kinds and their RNA remnants can also be found. 95 % of the observed microbes are visible but cannot be cultivated, so their RNA and DNA sequences are not known. Because even cell cultures (e.g. Vero E6 cells) are never free of microbes and countless impurities of any kind, there is an absolute obligation to isolate the suspected virus and to extract its own nucleic acid (in this case RNA) in pure form! It is very likely that the [proposed] genome of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is partly made up of such short gene sequences (as just described), which is why it is possible to test people "positive" from time to time (if there is enough organic material and the sample was not taken from the -healthy - parotid gland)..."
In this report, I will cite a range of articles to attempt to give a broad overview of what is going on now bringing PCR under scrutiny and with it the whole foundation of beliefs surrounding the supposed pandemic.
German virologist Christian Drosten, and the "Corman-Drosten paper"
Christian Drosten of Charité Medical School of Berlin has been the chief medical counselor to the Merckel government, and his advice has been listened to by the Germany government to the exclusion of all dissenting voices. His declarations have also had a profound influence on the trajectory taken by many scientists, physicians, bureaucrats, and politicians around the world.
The Corman-Drosten paper upon which laboratories worldwide have developed their PCR test protocols for the “detection” of SARS-Cov-2 was submitted to the scientific journal Ecosurveillance on January 21, 2020. It was accepted 24 hours later and was online by January 23. This makes any serious peer review highly improbable. The proposed testing protocol was also rapidly accepted and promulgated by the WHO and has been the major source for widespread tests used in fomenting panic...
More tests=>more "positives"=>more panic=>"more tests needed"
"Test, test, test" goes the refrain ...to no end
In late July, 2020, German evolutionary biologist and virologist Stefan Lanka pressed charges against virologist Christian Drosten for "Crimes against Humanity."
Stefan Lanka writes: "It is clear and obvious that Prof. Christian Drosten of the Charité Berlin has not only violated the most fundamental rules of scientific work with his actions in the Corona crisis. His action to construct an alleged virus detection test and to offer it to the world public via the World Health Organization (WHO) - before the Chinese scientists in charge of it had published indications of a possible presence of a harmless or dangerous virus - had the intention to globalize the wave of panic in Wuhan/China which started on December 30, 2019."
--from "Virologist Dr. Lanka presses charges against Christian Drosten" (emphasis mine)
See also The Virus Misinterpretation II, The Beginning and End of the Corona Crisis by Stefan Lanka
These are weighty accusations, and certainly require substantiation. But be it noted that Lanka is not the only person heading to the courts to bring an end to a scandal that has tossed the whole world into mayhem. I'll go into a some of the many cases already in line--and even a few that have already been determined--centering around the PCR test that has been used everywhere to cast the picture of a pandemic out of control and the need for dramatic measures to, well... at least we were told early on..."slow the spread."
But first a little more background...
Timeline of the events
The following timeline for the PCR test of Prof. Drosten and Charité Medical School is reproduced from The science fraud by Prof. Christian Drosten:
On 30.12.2019: the ophthalmologist Li Wenliang informed professional colleagues by whatsapp that there were 7 cases in his hospital that were confirmed positive for SARS.
On 31.12.2019: the government in Beijing sent an "intervention force" of virologists and epidemiologists to support the cause in Wuhan.
On 01.01.2020: Prof. Christian Drosten from the Charité heard about it and immediately started the development of SARS [computer modeled] viruses before it was even clear and could be clear whether the report from China about SARS was true and proven, and above all before the Chinese virologists published their results! He testified that as of January 1, 2020, he had developed a genetic detection method (3) to reliably prove the presence of the new corona virus in humans.
On 21.01.2020 (3 days before the first publication of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention [CCDC]) the WHO recommended (4) all nations to use the "safe" test procedure developed by Prof. Drosten.
Fact: Prof. Drosten used scientifically NOT verified data for his rapidly globalized PRC test of the 2019-nCOV, which was renamed SARS-CoV-2 on February 7, 2020 with the participation of Prof. Drosten. This gave the impression that the Chinese had actually discovered a new virus, but this was never the case! (5)
The claim that he has a reliable test procedure is therefore completely impossible. Drosten breaks and disregards the following rules with it.
1. Disregard of the clearly defined rules of science, which are part of his employment contract. (6)
2. The increase and globalisation of the Chinese epidemic panic, in which he violated the thinking and logic of virology.
On 23.01.2020: Publication (7) of the development of the test method of Prof. Drosten. On page 3 of this article, left column, 8 lines from below, he describes the first and decisive step of his approach:
At that time, no clinical data were available that could have been the basis for such a presumption.
Here we have straight from the authors of the study that their first steps and assumptions were made based on social media reports PRIOR to the release of any virus sequences; they simply assumed that the (also assumed) "new virus" must be related to SARS-CoV-(1) with no evidence for such an assumption and no virus isolates or samples available.
When in silico (computer model) gene sequencing for 2019-nCoV was made available online by the Chinese on January 10, the Charité virologists continued working without any isolates or samples obtained from any patients assumed to have the new illness (there were none in Germany). Instead they developed and employed a new methodology for going forward with their work without said samples or virus isolates, simply relying on the Wuhan sequence and comparing it with their previously invented assays.
Scientific review of the Corman-Drosten paper reveals major flaws
As of Nov. 27, 2020, an independent peer review by 22 members of the International Consortium of Scientists in Life Sciences (ICSLS) brings to light major flaws in the Corman-Drosten paper, revealing that ALL ASSUMPTIONS REGARDING THE PREVALENCE AND INFECTIOUSNESS OF AN ALLEGED SARS-COV-2 VIRUS NEED TO BE RE-ASSESSED.
External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results, International Consortium of Scientists in Life Sciences (ICSLS)
There is so much in this scientific review that is damning to the entire Corman/Drosten protocol (and every one of the subsequent assumptions based on it worldwide) that I would hardly know how to begin describing it...
Additionally, the Consortium petitioned Ecosurveillance to withdraw the Corman, et. al. paper. Ecosurveillance delayed two months in responding and then simply dismissed the concerns without specifically addressing any of the problems brought up.
The WHO says laboratory high PCR cycle-thresholds create "false positives"...
A PCR-cyle threshold (ct) is the number of cycles used before the test is declared "negative". A very low number of cycles will not reveal any "positives", whereas a very high-cycle threshold (of say 60 cycles or more) could result in everyone "testing positive". The relatively high cycle thresholds used by most laboratories around the world has resulted in sensationalism concerning the "spread of the virus"...
The World Health Organization released a guidance memo on December 14th, warning that high cycle thresholds on PCR tests will result in false positives.
While this information is accurate, it has also been available for months, so we must ask: why are they reporting it now? Is it to make it appear the vaccine works?
...
It’s been commonly available knowledge, for months now, that any test using a CT value over 35 is potentially meaningless.
1993 Nobel Prize Laureate in biochemistry Kary Mullis had the following to say about the DNA amplification process he invented...
"It starts making you believe in the sort of Buddhist notion that everything is contained in everything else. If you can amplify one single molecule up to something you can really measure, which PCR can do, then there is just very few molecules that you don’t have at least one single one of in your body.”
(If you want to fact-check this statement, check out this article and the embedded video where you can watch Mullis discussing the relevance, or non-relevance, of PCR results in the diagnosis of AIDS.)
Lisbon appeals court rules that PCR is unsuited for diagnosis of infection... Courts in Germany, Netherlands, Austria & other countries follow
Many cases are lining up in the courts in Europe, the U.S. and Canada centered around the use of PCR which gives a false impression to the public—these include one (or more) international class action lawsuit(s). Some courts have already ruled that PCR cannot be used legally to diagnose or pre-suppose infection. Notably, this case in Portugal...
Four German holidaymakers who were illegally quarantined in Portugal after one was judged to be positive for Covid-19 have won their case, in a verdict that condemns the widely-used PCR test as being up to 97-percent unreliable...
The Portuguese judges cited a study conducted by “some of the leading European and world specialists,” which was published by Oxford Academic at the end of September. It showed that if someone tested positive for Covid at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher, the chances of that person actually being infected is less than three percent, and that “the probability of… receiving a false positive is 97% or higher.”
Landmark legal ruling finds that Covid tests are not fit for purpose. So what do the MSM do? They ignore it, by Peter Andrews, Irish science journalist and writer based in London. He has a background in life sciences, and graduated from the University of Glasgow with a degree in genetics.https://www.rt.com/op-ed/507937-covid-pcr-test-fail/https://www.rt.com/op-ed/507937-covid-pcr-test-fail/
Following the Portuguese, German and Dutch rulings, now the Austrian court has ruled that PCR tests are not suitable for COVID-19 diagnosis and that lockdowns has no legal or scientific basis.
The above quote is the first sentence in an article by Great Game India giving numerous links to articles on the many court cases going on around the world.
Anti-fraud lawyer Reiner Fuellmich issues Drosten a cease and desist order for misleading the public
In early Dec. 2020, German-American lawyer Reiner Fuellmich issued Christian Drosten a cease and desist order, levying hefty charges. I will not go into the details of the indictment. Instead, I present the following excerpt from the conclusion to Fuellmich’s letter to Drosten...
No one – so far – is protecting the population in general and companies [businesses] in particular from the misinformation that underlies the lockdown policy.
You, as the one whose advice those in power listen to most, are personally liable for this misinformation, in both criminal and civil law. Your personal responsibility for the harm described above [in a litany of charges detailed in the letter] will not change even if a judicial hearing reveals that policymakers deliberately misused the Corona crisis to push an agenda that had nothing to do with containing an (alleged) pandemic, under the guise of protecting against infection, and that those decision-makers were merely drawing on your professional expertise for the apparent legitimization of their actions in order to conceal their real intentions. In this case, by making the above allegations, you have aided and abetted reprehensible damage to numerous persons and wicked damage to our client – within the meaning of Section 830 (2) of the German Civil Code (BGB) and Section 27 (1) of the German Criminal Code (StGB). Your assistance had a very significant effect on the crime. People only trusted the governments and authorities because they believed that the risk assessment was scientifically sound. And people have placed their faith in this precisely because of you....In addition, we request that you correct the following statements to those politically responsible and to the public:
-Clarify that there is no reason to believe that SARS-CoV-2 could cause an uncontrollable number of deaths and ICU patients
-Clarify that the case study in the New England Journal of Medicine of March 5, 2020, in which you were involved and which supposedly proves an asymptomatic infection, is based on false data and therefore should have been retracted long ago
-Clarify that a positive PCR test cannot detect active infection and is therefore not suitable to establish a COVID-19 diagnosis on its own
-Clarify that collective restrictions on freedom do not do anything to contain the spread, but are proven to cause massive collateral damage
We also call on you to refrain from your previous statements to the contrary. Politicians must no longer be advised with scientifically inadequate information. And the public must no longer be confused with such assertions.
https://cormandrostenreview.com/cease-and-desist-order-fuellmich-drosten/
The Corona Comittee
Above video: Reiner Fuellmich and the Corona Comittee in Germany interviews Isreali lawyer Tamir Turgal. Turgal discusses how the rights of informed consent and privacy developed following World War II and the Nuremburg trials are now being abrogated and thown away in a society controlled by media propaganda.
Fuelmich is part of an international coalition of lawyers and scientists bringing the claims of pandemic promulgators under fire. On July 10, 2020 the German "Corona Extra-parlamentary Inquiry Committee", (or Corona Committee) formed by Fuellmich and three other lawyers began conducting interviews with qualified scientists and authorities in attempt to understand the truth behind the pandemic. Once they felt they understood the situation and could prove the scientific fallacies of the pandemic in a court of law, they along with many others from around the world proceeded to bring lawsuits against those most indicated in deceiving the public...
According to the attorneys involved, the coming tsunami of legal action against the COVID-19 tyrants within and outside government represents the biggest set of tort lawsuits in human history. The scientists and medical experts in the coalition contend that governments’ response to the “pandemic” was beyond unjustified. Whether justice can be secured in courts across the United States and even in other nations, though, remains to be seen.
Among the lawyers working in Europe is Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, a German-American high-profile lawyer who’d won monumental cases against the world’s largest corporations. Dr. Fuellmich works with the plaintiff Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg who also exposed the fraud behind the “swine flu” hysteria in 2009 in which at that time, he was a member of the German parliament as well as a member of the Council of Europe. The “2009 swine flu” was another scam perpetrated by the same entities behind the current coronavirus scam, particularly the World Health Organization (WHO) and other private companies connected to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), aiming to impose mandatory vaccinations to the general population and establish draconian policies toward citizens.
https://www.weblyf.com/2020/11/coronavirus-lawsuits-pcr-tests-unreliability-is-now-being-used-for-class-action/
Not so many people today know that this COVID scam is not the first but just one of the many attempts of the World Health Organizations (WHO) to deceive the public in order to enable the United Nations (UN) to further its agenda of global governance and control through the use of so-called public health and safety agenda as justification. In addition, this fake pandemic is also just another way to channel huge amount of profit for pharmaceutical companies through their so-called therapeutics and vaccines, much like what they did during the 2010 H1N1 scam.
The 2010 H1N1 flu scare was mainly exposed by a German physician, who was also the head of health at the Council of Europe at that time, named Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg. Just like what they did using Neil Ferguson’s fraudulent epidemiological computer model of infection for fear-mongering tactic, the department of health had warned that the swine flu could bring about 65,000 deaths. The morgues were told to prepare for “massive numbers of bodies” and the Army was also told that they “may have to deal with riots on the streets as people fought to get hold of drugs”. However, much like the failure of Neil Ferguson’s epidemiological computer model in the US and in the UK, those things did not happen.
According to Dr. Wodarg:
“The great campaign of panic we have seen provided a golden opportunity for representatives from labs who knew they would hit the jackpot in the case of a pandemic being declared. We want to clarify everything that brought about this massive operation of disinformation. We want to know who made decisions, on the basis of what evidence, and precisely how the influence of the pharmaceutical industry came to bear on the decision-making.”
Reiner Fuellmich in a March discussion with other lawyers...
RF: Yeah. This kind of match is what we’ve heard from Judge Angelo Georgiani from Italy. He’s a former anti-mafia prosecutor and he says the same thing, this is a huge case of money laundering. Maybe Deutche bank is at the centre of this, there is some pretty concrete evidence that points in that direction, but it’s astonishing that this is going on, even now; and the people get caught red handedly dealing with money laundering, I can’t believe this.
...
None of the local, none of the national judiciaries, we think, can deal with this gigantic crime against humanity. That’s why we’ve been discussing and seriously discussing that sooner or later we will have to set up a Nuremberg 2.0 type court international court and we will have to agree on what substantive law and what procedural law we shall apply, but right now we still have a little bit of time because right now we’re very busy focusing on the PCR test cases, and of course on that class action in Canada, which also has the PCR tests at its core, because we need as many judgements after the hearing of expert witnesses, as many judgements as possible that state that PCR tests contrary to what Drosden and Tedros are saying, cannot tell you anything about infections.
See also... Reiner Fuellmich - We have the evidence
Additional links:
An in-detail analysis of PCR and the many ways in which it fails to show the presence of a virus.
Much of the information, even alternative information, about what PCR can or cannot do starts with the assumption that a virus exists, has been properly characterized, and has been shown to cause disease. Meanwhile, as a general rule, none of this has been proven.
