--The present article is a brief summary of a vast body of historical information that exposes the fallacy of ubiquitous propaganda regarding the alleged effectiveness and safety of vaccines. I've discussed some of this material in greater detail in Pandemics and the Abuse of Power: A Timeline 1853-2020. Dr. Suzanne Humphries Phd. and Roman Bystrianyk provide a thorough investigation of the history of vaccines in their book, Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines and the Forgotten History. (Preview online or download here.)
It's a common belief that vaccines saved the world from smallpox, polio and many other diseases, but is this belief based on historical fact? Consider the following...
Smallpox was the first "vaccine" to be developed near the end of the 18th century. But during the 1800's, mortality from scarlet fever, a disease attributed as the cause of a much greater number of deaths than smallpox, declined at a greater rate than mortality from smallpox, even though there was no vaccine for scarlet fever. This fact alone disallows decline in smallpox mortality to be attributed to vaccination, because to do so would be to ignore the decline in mortality associated with scarlet fever.
Moreover, in 1871 after 70 years of widespread infant vaccination and 20 years of absolute (100+%) mandatory smallpox vaccination in England, there was a large outbreak of smallpox in Leicester, England, leading to 300 deaths. Many parents and concerned neigbors of vaccine-injured families who had held back their protests out of fear of authority rose up in defiance of the strict mandatory vaccination law. Similar protests were expressed throughout England. In ensuing years, politicians supporting mandatory vaccination were voted out in Leicester, and mandatory vaccination was brought to an end. After the banning of mandatory vaccination, smallpox declined and never returned to previous levels in Leicester.
During the late 1800s, prominent doctors and academics joined the ranks of parents who protested vaccines that were injuring or killing their children. One of these was Charles Chreighton who was asked to write the article on vaccination for the 9th edition of Encyclopedia Britannica. In the course of his investigations for the article, Chreighton went from being pro-vaccine to being one of vaccination's greatest skeptics. In his words:
The anti-vaccinists are those who have found some motive for scrutinizing the evidence, generally the very human motive of vaccinal injuries or fatalities in their own families or in those of their neighbours. Whatever their motive, they have scrutinized the evidence to some purpose; they have mastered nearly the whole case; they have knocked the bottom out of a grotesque superstition. The public at large cannot believe that a great profession should have been so perseveringly in the wrong.
--Charles Chreighton, late 1800's
In the first half of the 20th century, mortalities due to scarlet fever, along with that of measles, typhoid fever, whooping cough, and diptheria, continued to drop dramatically, ALL PRIOR to the development of any vaccines for these illnesses. The ONLY way the decline in these illnesses can be attributed to vaccination is through a MASS PROPAGANDA CAMPAIGN, one that permeates public schools, universites, government institutions and the media. Unfortunately, that's exactly the situation we have.
For more graphs showing the decline of disease independent of vaccinces, click here.
In like manner, deaths from polio peaked in 1952 and began to drop rapidly prior to Salk's vaccine being introduced in 1954. As pointed out by Jim West, the incidince of Polio coincided with the dissemination of neurotoxic pesticides (lead arsenate in the late 1800's and then DDT and BHC), and decline in the disease in the U.S. coincided with exportation of DDT and BHC to other countries. Meanwhile, the introduction of Salk's vaccine resulted in an increase in paralytic polio and in the number of deaths, but new recommendations from the WHO on methods of catagorizing the disease introduced at the same time made the vaccine program appear successful.
What many don't realize is that there is BIG, BIG MONEY behind vaccines and every motive for corrupt, money-hungry corporate heads and bureaucrats (and the media) to promote them and suppress any attempt to reveal their fallibility.
Let us not forget the thousands that were paralyzed in 1976 through the U.S. government vaccination program during the fabricated Swine Flu scare; with full knowledge of the CDC head that such injuries were a clear possiblity, as this searing 60 Minutes show reveals...
And what about the possible association of MMR vaccine and the exponential growth of autism. Is there any connection? The CDC says no... but should we trust what 5 people behind closed doors deliberated for four years? Did they present the actual results of the study they were asked to make?
The controversial film Vaxxed: From Coverup to Catastrophe reveals much needed information. Autism has been increasing exponentially since the 1970's and is reaching such severe epidmic proportions that if the trend continues it could cripple the entire world economy. The mere numbers of families affected make Covid-19 look like mama's apple pie. What's causing it? Couild vaccines and antibiotics given to infants and toddlers be a contributing factor?
Watch trailer here. For more details visit https://vaxxedthemovie.com/ or rent or buy on Vudu.
The new Covid-19 vaccines are just as susceptible to causing injury as any other in history... even moreso, since Covid vaccines have been rushed to the market. (See Update below...) And Coronavirus vaccines are the most experimental vaccines ever administered. Be advised, since the 1990s, in the U.S. vaccine manufacturers and administrators (doctors, hospitals, etc.) have been exempt from all liability; and double-blind tests are never done (unlike with any other drug). Not only are vaccines paid for and promoted by the government, but the government itself makes itself responsible for compensating for vaccine injuries and pays out millions in taxpayer money in compensation to vaccine injured families every year EVEN WHILE SEVERELY LIMITING THE CLAIMS PROCESS and never openly informing the public that an avenue of compensation exists or that vaccine injuries are even a possibility.
But be forewarned, new inscrupulous designs may leave you an even slimmer chance of being compensated if you are injured by a Covid vaccine...
Straight from NBC...
Update:
Since the introduction of the new, experimental Covid vaccines, there have been a very diverse and alarming number of adverse events and deaths in association with these vaccines.
A number of countries have systems in place for collecting reports on vaccine-related adverse events. These systems were ostensibly created to provide vaccine companies, health organizations and government with early warnings so that vaccines could be assured to be safe (or made safer), yet all the warnings have been brazenly ignored by the institutions concerned.
As of March 11, 2022 the following data has been collected on adverse events following Covid injections in the United States alone through the CDC's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS):
1,183,493 Adverse Event Reports for Covid Jabs Through March 11, 2022
4,335 Miscarriages
13,012 Shingles
For current numbers and expanded information on adverse events following Covid injections visit:
https://openvaers.com/covid-data
For information on all vaccines visit:
https://openvaers.com/
A 52 page report by David Jonsorensen and Dr. Vladimir Zelenko (Sept. 2021) discusses "Evidence of millions of deaths and serious adverse events resulting from the experimental COVID-19 injections" around the world, the majority of which are not reported officially.
We aim to only present scientific facts and stay away from unfounded claims. The data is clear and verifiable. Over one hundred references can be found for all presented information...
They cite CDC health fraud detection expert, Jane Doe, who estimates that actual deaths from Covid injections are, conservatively, on the order of 5 times higher than those reported on VAERS:
'I have, over the last 25 years, developed over 100 distinct healthcare fraud detection algorithms. ... When the COVID-19 vaccine clearly became associated with patient death and harm, I was inclined to investigate the matter. It is my professional estimate that VAERS (the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) database, while extremely useful, is under-reported by a conservative factor of at least 5. ... and have assessed that the deaths occurring within 3 days of vaccination are higher than those reported in VAERS by a factor of at least 5.'
See Jane Doe's legal affadavit here.
Related Articles:
Myth vs. Reality in Covid Russia by Edward Slavsquat (on the Sputnik V injections)
For complete legal and philosophical information on vaccines visit the National Vaccine Information Center, the oldest non-government website in the U.S. on vaccine injury and informed consent.
This article is available in flyer form (in Spanish only).
